Showing posts with label Beyond. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Beyond. Show all posts

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Civilization: Beyond Earth review: Absolutely stellar

I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop.

Here I am, turn 210. A mere two centuries ago I landed on this planet with naught but a handful of colonists, a rudimentary understanding of the Habitation technology, and the means to stake out a better future for humanity.

That original colony is unrecognizable now. In the years since we first set foot upon these barren, rocky lands, we've built up a massive trading empire that's the envy of the entire planet. Our small home-away-from-home has become a mass of skyscrapers, and it's but the centerpiece to a civilization that contains three healthy and happy cities. Our treasury is filled with excess energy which we can use to outright buy units or new buildings when the sweat of our brow won't do. Because everyone likes a little more money in their pockets, our traders have managed to finagle friendly relations with more than half the colonies on this forsaken world.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

Click to enlarge any screenshots on this page

We're well on the way to emancipating the human race from its self-inflicted bonds.

Everything is going exactly as planned, which is why I'm a nervous wreck. After all, any veteran Civilization player knows it's right when things seem perfect that it's all about to fall apart.

Whether you refer to Civilization: Beyond Earth as "Civilization V in space" or "The Sequel to Alpha Centauri We Never Got," the fact remains that it feels very familiar. We've now had more than two decades of Sid Meier-branded 4X games (eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, eXterminate) and while the production value has inevitably gone up through the years, it's fundamentally the same game every time.

Perhaps it speaks to the quality and the inventiveness of Civilization: Beyond Earth, then, that this is the first Civilization game I've been hooked on in years.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

It really is, at its core, a re-skin. You're still hastening to construct a city or a range of cities faster than your opponents, in pursuit of ever-improving technologies and a host of stat-boosting, one-per-world Wonders. Instead of the ancient world's Warrior, now your initial melee unit is called a Soldier. The Archer of old is a Ranger. Trade is carried out by Convoys, not Caravans. Brave New World's Archaeologist is now an Explorer, with the same purpose—to dig up artifacts for your colony.

Most importantly, you're still going to want just one more turn to round out the night.

There's something about Firaxis being liberated from the constraints of historical plausibility that's freeing. The range of science fiction and nonfiction influences is clear, from Dune to Foundation to Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon, and references are dotted everywhere from the menus to Wonders to unit designs. It's not that this is necessarily better than the standard Civilization aesthetic. Rather, it helps make what's old feel new again.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

If I have any qualms, it's that the new names for old concepts make starting the game a bit of a chore. Poring over the interlaced tech web is particularly tedious, as you try to associate names like Genetic Design and Artificial Evolution with whatever strategy you're pursuing. It's not nearly as intuitive as Civilization proper. Everyone knows what results from researching Agriculture or Flight, or the benefits of Steam Power, but something like "Alien Ethics" is a bit more mysterious.

Other tweaks to the Civilization formula are welcome, though—particularly the new win conditions. Previous Civilization games have allowed you to win by military domination, launching a rocket into space (basically the beginning of Beyond Earth), being voted World Leader by the United Nations, spreading your culture worldwide, or simply having the highest score when time runs out (which is the least satisfying victory of all).

Beyond Earth still lets you wipe your opponents out with a military victory or run the clock out, but the other win conditions change up Civilization completely. You now follow one of three Affinities: Supremacy, Harmony, or Purity. (See the screenshot below for basic descriptions of each.) Whichever you're most adept in is reflected in the design of your units and city. Each Affinity is pursued through the tech web, and they're not mutually exclusive. You could pursue Harmony for half the game in order to get the alien mobs off your back, then switch to Purity because you want to destroy said aliens.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

You're better off focusing on one Affinity from the start, however, for two reasons. 1) The high-level units and unique units are incredibly powerful. 2) You need to hit level 13 in one of these Affinities in order to unlock three of the win conditions. The fourth non-military, non-time victory is Affinity-ambiguous, if you just want to experiment.

Simply put, the new victories are great. They're complex, multi-step processes that completely change the way you play the game and feel actually worth pursuing instead of just aiming for the military win. They make it so non-military players actually have something to do at the end of the game instead of just tapping the "Next Turn" button repeatedly. That's a huge change for Civilization.

Helping to keep you on track is the new Quest system, which forces you to make decisions about your colony's evolution and provides some more guidance than previous Civilization games.

Civilization: Beyond Eartjavascript://h

While interesting in theory, the Quest system may need some tweaking. Right now it railroads down a specific path a bit too much, and it's too predictable. Most technologies have a Quest decision associated with them, and it always shows up. If you build the Ultrasonic Fence to keep aliens out of your city, for instance, you always know that you'll soon get the option to attach the same defenses to your trade convoys. Always. While some people will appreciate the predictability, it makes the system feel exploitable instead of like an actual organic series of quests.

Trade also feels overpowered in this early incarnation of Beyond Earth. You basically need trade in order to bolster your science and production output, and anything you can do to enhance trade is a smart move even if you're not initially looking to form a trade empire. It's also an easily exploited system—newly formed colonies provide more trade benefits than older ones. Thus it's a viable strategy to unleash some small, fledgling colonies to trade with and get a production boost for a few turns on a Wonder or an end-game victory condition.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

By contrast, the new Orbital Layer feels underutilized. You can launch satellites into orbit that provide various boosts, from food to combat buffs to actual weaponry. The game doesn't urge you to use the feature much, though, and I could see new players forgetting it's there after a while. It doesn't help that concepts like "Orbital Coverage" are poorly explained, making the system as a whole a bit bewildering.

And then we come to Favors, which are the big diplomatic addition. Instead of needing to make an agreement with foreign colonies for practical goods—say, I'll open my borders to you for a bunch of money—you can instead help out other colonies in return for Favors. Basically, "Hey, here's an IOU note for giving me access to that Titanium/Xenomass/ (Insert Other Resource) earlier."

Unfortunately it's hard to quantify the real-world value of a Favor, and I accumulated a ton only to find them basically useless later. The leader of the neighboring "Russian" colony (now termed the Slavic Federation) racked up ten or so Favors with me late in the game and then declared war on my colony.

Civilization: Beyond Earth

Even after wiping out most of his military and taking hold of one of his cities he refused to negotiate for peace, rendering all those accumulated Favors useless. It's an interesting system, but the ambiguous value of a Favor makes it harder to know whether you're getting screwed or not.

You know what, though? Civilization: Beyond Earth's issues pale in comparison to the fantastic whole. Unlike Civilization V, which took multiple expansions before it felt as polished and deep as its predecessors, Beyond Earth already plays like a complete experience. Most of the features from Civilization V's excellent Brave New World expansion already made it into the base Beyond Earth game, plus a smattering of new ideas.

It has some issues and sure, there are some systems I expect Firaxis will tweak or develop further in coming expansions, but Beyond Earth is basically Civilization V in space—and I mean that in the best way possible.


From PC World. Electronics product reviews and advice for best reference

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Review: Futuremark looks beyond the PC with new 3DMark

Futuremark is busy these days shaking up their benchmarking business, and the new 3DMark is proof that nothing is off the table. PC, WinRT, Android and iOS support are all planned, although the Windows and Android versions are currently the only ones available.

Visuals are a real improvement over 3DMark 11.

3DMark's version numbers have been ditched from the product name in an attempt to emphasize the new cross-platform nature of the release. This ill-advised gesture is ignored by the faithful and the press alike, including me.

Naming gaffes aside, Futuremark has undertaken the long-overdue rework of their flagship product and emerged with a slick package that sheds the weight of past releases and restores the luxurious visuals and sense of style that have been absent from the last few versions.

Installation isn't complicated and remains free of add-on traps and other bloatware, although the gigabyte-sized download isn't petite. Make sure you read the latest instructions: In the case of the AMD 7950 in my test system, beta drivers were actually recommended over certified ones. Once installed, it presents you with a window where the three test environments that comprise the suite can be selected for a benchmarking pass. Advanced options let you select custom visual settings, enable demo modes, loop benchmarks for stress testing and view past results.

GPU and CPU temperature charts add a new twist to the results display.

Ice Storm depicts a low-count polygon world suitable for mobile devices and legacy or entry-level PCs. This is the benchmark destined to run on smartphones, tablets, WinRT devices and similar. The level of detail is roughly equivalent to DirectX 9. The demo mode for this world space is particularly well conceived and despite the lower level of detail, may be the most visually dynamic of the three.

Cloud Gate is the middle child, designed to test laptops and office PCs. The stately flybys of massive spacecraft and jump gates are a touch hazy here, but impressive nevertheless. This one is for PCs only, which is a shame, since data on high-end tablets would be of interest. The physics test is particularly tough here, producing FPS numbers lower than Fire Strike, which indicates a CPU bias at play.

On the high end is Fire Strike, a fantasy-flavored virtual buffet of advanced effects and massive polygon counts that's designed with tomorrow's hardware in mind, although it will run on today's more muscular PCs with reasonable speed. The gaming system used in my labs managed 30-35 FPS with a single top-shelf videocard and mid-range quad core processor. Laptop usage is euphemistic at best, unless you're packing a specialty road-gaming rig. Needless to say, it'll be a long time before anything like a tablet will have electrics dreams like these.

Even the low-end Ice World settings produce impressive results.

Glitches are few and largely attributable to the 1.00 status of the release. Information fields for processors and video cards yielded blank space on some runs and correct data on others. Users reported partially functional SLI and Crossfire support, which is sadly nothing new to PC gaming, benchmark software or otherwise. Also, OpenGL ES 3.0 support would have been nice.

Nevertheless, the scope here is greater than previous 3DMark updates, and the overhaul is mostly successful and complete. Longtime 3DMark users will notice that some details available in previous versions are missing from the more streamlined results available here.

Custom settings let hardware geeks get close to their precious.

While this is sure to spark forum wars, the appearance of other long-awaited features such as temperature monitoring seem more relevant to gamers today and a better expenditure of the limited programming resources available to the Futuremark team.

Besides, this leaves room for improvement for the next version. Whatever they eventually decide to call it.

Note: The Download button takes you to the vendor's site, where you can download the latest version of the software.


From PC World. Electronics product reviews and advice for best reference

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Bye, Bye Cable? Aereo to Expand Mobile TV Service Beyond NYC

Score one for the cord cutters! Actually, make that score two: a mere day after a federal judge denied a temporary injunction television broadcasters were seeking against Aereo, the company’s billionaire backer, Barry Diller, said that the company has plans to expand to several U.S. cities in the coming months.

What’s all the hub-bub about? Aereo keeps a multitude of dime-sized HD antennas — one for each customer — in its New York data center, which capture the free television signals being transmitted over the air by local broadcast stations. Aereo then streams a feed of the live stations over the Internet to its subscribers, who pay $12 per month to receive the local TV programming via web browser or Aereo’s mobile apps and supported devices. DVR-style recording and playback is also supported.

Aereo says it’s the way TV will be watched in the future; CBS, Fox, Univision, PBS and others say it’s copyright infringement and are suing to sideline the company. Aereo claims it doesn’t need to pay fees to retransmit the stations’ signals due to its unique antenna array.

The judge’s ruling certainly seems to have bolstered Diller’s spirits. Aereo is currently only offered in NYC and only streams to devices within city limits, but yesterday, Diller told Bloomberg that will change soon.

“We’re going to really start marketing,” he said. “Within a year and a half, certainly by ’13, we’ll be in most major (markets).”

Don’t sell off your Slingbox in anticipation of Aereo’s arrival in your town just yet, though; the actual lawsuit brought by the television stations still needs to work its way through court before Aereo gets the legal all-clear.


From Laptopmagazine. Visit Amazon Computer and Notebook Center Here

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Examine Differences Between Files With Beyond Compare

Beyond Compare Standard edition ($30) is a powerful utility for tracking down differences between files and folders. Its feature set is comparable to free and open-source WinMerge, with a few added extras such as comparing images and music file metadata, and support for comparing files over FTP.

Beyond Compare HTML diff screenshotBeyond Compare supports syntax highlighting and can be used to compare HTML documents.Beyond Compare's interface is straightforward and easy to understand. It uses tabs, so you can have several compare sessions at the same time. Each session compares two folders or two files of the same type. Each file or folder compared gets a pane, and you can browse the two panes to see the differences.

The first thing I tried to do with Beyond Compare was compare two versions of a scholarly text. It tracked down the differences, but the interface made it difficult for me to find them: Beyond Compare does not support word wrapping. This means each lengthy paragraph in my article got just a single line, and I had to keep scrolling horizontally to see the rest of the line. Not very convenient.

Beyond Compare MP3 diff screenshotBeyond Compare's MP3 comparison feature only goes into metadata, not actual sound.I got better results comparing HTML. My file did not have overly long lines--and I use a widescreen monitor--so the manual line breaks in the file itself were enough to make it readable in Beyond Compare. I could easily see the differences between two versions of the same HTML file, and merge them any way I wanted to.

Beyond Compare also has a feature for finding differences between image files. I tried it with two PCWorld logo files I found online. It was no surprise that Beyond Compare confirmed that the files were absolutely identical. Then I made them different with a simple tweak, just shifting one file on its canvas. Beyond Compare visually highlighted the differences, showing where pixels didn't match in the two files.

Beyond Compare image diff screenshotBeyond Compare's image comparison feature works visually, letting you see which pixels are different.Unlike the image comparison feature, MP3 comparison did not go into the actual sound data stored in the files. Beyond Compare simply laid out the metadata (ID3 tag) for each of the files, and showed me the differences. This is marginally useful, but if you are serious about your MP3 metadata you are better off using the free (and excellent) MusicBrainz Picard.

Beyond Compare was fast and responsive when I tested it, and the features worked as described. That said, unless you need some of its more exotic features such as FTP support, you may get similar results using one of the free alternatives.

--Erez Zukerman

Beyond Compare is a directory compare utility and a file compare utility wrapped in one. Synchronize files between laptop and PC, home and office, etc. Compare directory trees side-by-side with mismatches highlighted. Display text files side-by-side with changes highlighted. Great for merging changes to source code. Supports minor editing, Unicode text files, and Delphi form files. Save favorite sessions for quick access. Built-in FTP and zip support.


From PCWorld. Visit Amazon Computer and Notebook Center here

Monday, February 13, 2012

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

After Google, Twitter, and Facebook, Yelp is arguably the Internet company next in line to have its name converted into a verb. If you want to find a restaurant, a plumber, or even a lawyer, Yelp probably has you covered.

As a consumer, you likely use Yelp and similar services all the time; but as a business owner, you realize what a double-edged sword it is. Many restaurateurs have watched their free time vanish along with their hair as they tried to massage their Yelp star rating and appease every last customer unhappy with the crème brulee.

Today, however, Yelp is only part of the puzzle. Assorted competitors--some from the giants of the Web--also give consumers a soapbox upon which they can express their views about all manner of service providers. Navigating this landscape of user-review services is tricky, since it’s hard to tell at a glance how popular or comprehensive a site is. Many sites also license reviews: A site may look stuffed to the gills with user-written restaurant reviews, yet the posts are actually borrowed from Citysearch or OpenTable.

A full comparison of user-reviews sites.A full comparison of user-reviews sites.We analyzed the biggest, most popular websites that let users review service-based businesses. Read on for a sense of the size and relative reach of each of these sites, as well as a look at the costs and benefits of becoming a member, and the policies that protect the site from spam and shield the business owner from abuse.

Yelp

The 800-pound gorilla, Yelp has massive power in this industry. Restaurants and other service businesses go out of their way to cater to prolific Yelpers, to curry those coveted five-star reviews.

While Yelp is best known for its reviews of restaurants, it covers the gamut of the service industry. And although some small-town shops may not have any reviews, Yelp will often have those companies in its database.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

Yelp has long been under fire, however, for a host of perceived slights, including accusations of phony reviews (both good and bad) and predatory practices that allegedly goad the recipients of negative reviews into upgrading to a higher tier of service. Yelp defends against these accusations by saying that it actively polices reviews through an automated filter system (which protects against both malicious content and shill reviews), and that all businesses can claim their account on the site free of charge. Business owners can respond to any review, as well.

But even paying members can’t remove negative reviews, and instead can only upgrade their pages and sponsor search results. Prices range from $300 to $1000 per month. A Groupon-style Yelp Deals service is available.

Yelp may not be the final word in customer-review sites, and upgrading can be exorbitantly expensive in comparison with the costs at other review sites, but its clout is undeniable. Ignore its reviews at your peril.

Google Places

Launched as Hotpot in November 2010, Google's review and rating service folded into Google Places in April 2011. It is now adding a million reviews a month, becoming one of the fastest-growing services on this list.

Tightly integrated with Google's search and map services, Google Places is free for both users and businesses, and results automatically show up during searches. Once businesses claim their Place, they can flesh out their information, and add interior photos and videos, as well as respond publicly to individual reviews (good or bad). But that’s where Places ends: To promote your business further, you’ll have to turn to AdWords.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

Google acknowledges that it has work to do on curtailing abusive and spammy reviews, but the company notes that businesses can flag any bad or malicious content as inappropriate through links on every page.

Overall, given the popularity of Google in general--and Places’ zero-dollar price tag--there’s no reason not to claim your Google Place page, keep it updated with photos, and promptly address any concerns that users raise there.

Judy’s Book

Although this Yelp-like business reportedly has had financial trouble in recent years, Judy’s Book continues to operate on a national scale. The company covers the gamut of services, but is most popular for (its words) “businesses that serve moms and families.”

While the site has about a million user-written reviews, the vast majority of Judy’s Book’s content comes from partner sites, namely Citysearch and Demandforce. In fact, in a half-dozen sample searches in cities across the country, we didn’t find a single review originally written for the site.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

It’s free for businesses to claim their page on the site, and upgrades ($50 to $150 per month) get you a deeper profile with no ads on it, submission to search engines, and other perks. If your store has multiple locations, you can list up to five addresses under a single name with an upgraded account. Upgraded users can also respond to reviews (via email to the site).

Considering its size, Judy’s Book may not offer a compelling argument for upgrading your account, but there’s no reason not to claim your business’s page for free.

Angie’s List

This Columbus, Ohio-based business started back in 1995 with the goal of building a clearinghouse for users to provide commentary and reviews on local service businesses. Unlike most of the sites in this roundup, Angie’s List doesn’t cover restaurants--the bread and butter of most user-review sites--and it isn’t free for users. Angie’s List turns the model on its head: Consumers have to pay a membership fee to access the site. Businesses do not (and cannot) pay a fee to be listed.

Businesses with good ratings (at least a B) can advertise, but only if they offer Angie’s List members a discount. The company says that anonymous reviews are not allowed, which minimizes spam. And companies registered with the site can respond to reviews, free of charge.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

With 2 million members, Angie’s List isn’t huge, but since they are paying customers, they’re likely more engaged than casual Yelp or Google Places users. If you’re in Angie’s wheelhouse--especially if you operate any kind of home-repair business--it makes sense to keep tabs on your listing here.

Yahoo Local

Similar to Google Places, Yahoo Local automatically adds reviews to search results and maps that users generate through searches on the broader Yahoo network. As such, you don’t need a separate account on Yahoo Local to see reviews: They’re automatic for anyone using any Yahoo property.

Yahoo Local is huge, with more than 50 million reviews written on the site, and tens of millions more available via professionally curated partner content. Search for a restaurant, for example, and you’ll probably get dozens of user reviews, plus dozens more drawn from blogs and magazines.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

Claiming your business’s listing is free. Upgrades (which give more information on your page, photos, and the option to add coupons) cost $10 per month, making Yahoo Local one of the best bargains in this roundup. Businesses, upgraded or not, can respond to user reviews on the site--but, uniquely, so can anyone else, simply by clicking the 'Comment on Review' button. This flexibility means that reviews have the potential to be full of back-and-forth chatter instead of simply standing alone. Spam is moderated by machine and by humans.

Yahoo may not be the typical searcher’s first stop for review content today, but Yahoo is still a major Web destination, and Yahoo Local is surprisingly busy, stuffed with user commentary. Even if you don’t upgrade, it’s probably worthwhile to take a look at the service from time to time, to make sure that your customers there are happy.

MerchantCircle

In our sample searches, MerchantCircle, a smaller site, turned up a few questionable results. A search for “dentist” in our zip code, for instance, offered a virtual-assistant service as the number one result and a daily-deal site as number three. In addition, few businesses listed on the site appear to have any reviews associated with them at all.

Claiming your business's page is free, and upgraded listings run just $10 per month. The company also offers search engine marketing (SEM) services, for $29 to $249 per month. Businesses can respond to negative reviews (presuming that they actually get reviewed). MerchantCircle blocks spam algorithmically, and through disallowing anonymous comments.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

MerchantCircle bills itself more as a business-to-consumer social network than as a user-review website, but the lack of much activity here will make it a tertiary site for most businesses seeking to police their user reviews online. It is, however, a minimal investment for an upgraded account.

Citysearch

This venerable website is seemingly more involved with editorial content (and its popular “Best of Citysearch” polls) than with user reviews, and the volume of advertising on Citysearch can actually make it tough to find legitimate results among the chatter. Thirty percent of the site’s traffic comes from mobile devices.

As with Yelp, restaurants and bars are by far the biggest draw here. If you run another type of service business, chances are good that it won’t draw much attention from Citysearch.

Claiming your business's page is free. Upgrades let you enhance your listing page with the usual bio, photos, video, and extra verbiage. Upgraded accounts can also add deals and special offers, respond to reviews, and run targeted ads on the site. Pricing is performance based, and Citysearch does not release that information publicly. Spam is moderated via both humans and machine.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

Altogether, Citysearch's site is a fairly typical offering for this category, but primarily worth a look only if you serve food or drink.

Insider Pages

Owned by the same company that owns Citysearch, Insider Pages offers features and policies that are the same as Citysearch’s. But this site is essentially geared toward filling the hole that Citysearch leaves, namely in coverage of service businesses that users of the larger site tend to ignore.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

The biggest draw here is Doctor Finder, a fairly self-explanatory tool that lets you locate a nearby doctor who--most important--accepts your health insurance. Other services, including home repair, hair salons, and auto services, are also covered. Like Citysearch, Insider Pages does not disclose pricing. Physicians especially might want to consider a listing here.

TripAdvisor

If you’ve taken a vacation in the past few years, you’re probably familiar with TripAdvisor, which bills itself as the world’s largest travel site and travel community. The site’s coverage of this industry is massive: Its 60 million reviews make it nearly three times the size of Yelp, despite having fewer than 2 million businesses listed.

There’s no denying that if you operate a hotel, you need to be involved with TripAdvisor. Restaurants, particularly those that cater to tourists, are also popular here, but on a considerably lesser scale.

Beyond Yelp: Which User Review Services Matter?

Hotels can claim their TripAdvisor page for free and respond to comments, and TripAdvisor says that it actively polices the site for fraudulent activity--with stiff penalties for businesses that try to game the system. Upgraded accounts let businesses add Web links, contact information, and special offers to their pages. Fees to upgrade to the Business Listings package depend on the number of rooms your hotel has, ranging from $40 per month for a single-room inn to hundreds of dollars per month if your establishment has more than about 25 rooms.


From PCWorld. Visit Amazon Computer and Notebook Center here